We are a shoe-string operation. Unfortunately no BigOil funding! Help expose the hoax.

Westpac BSB 035612, Account No. 239469

All Scientists are Sceptics ~Professor Bob Carter

“Climate is and always has been variable. The only constant about climate is change; it changes continually.” ~Professor Tim Patterson

Perhaps the most frustrating aspect of the science of climate change is the lack of any real substance in attempts to justify the hypothesis ~Professor Stewart Franks

A lie told often enough becomes the truth.
-- Vladimir Ilyich Lenin - See more at: http://thepeoplescube.com/lenin/lenin-s-own-20-monster-quotes-t185.html#sthash.aTrSI3tG.dpuf
A lie told often enough becomes the truth.
-- Vladimir Ilyich Lenin - See more at: http://thepeoplescube.com/lenin/lenin-s-own-20-monster-quotes-t185.html#sthash.aTrSI3tG.dpuf
A lie told often enough becomes the truth.
-- Vladimir Ilyich Lenin - See more at: http://thepeoplescube.com/lenin/lenin-s-own-20-monster-quotes-t185.html#sthash.aTrSI3tG.dpuf

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

ACT Government supports Killing Climate Deniers.

Aspen Island
According to Section 31 of the Crimes Act
(1) A person who intentionally or recklessly, and knowing its contents, sends or delivers, or directly or indirectly causes to be received, any document threatening to kill or inflict bodily harm on any person is liable to imprisonment for 10 years.
The ACT Government has just issued such a document. In the ACT Government's  2015 ACT Arts Fund successful applicants they list:
  • Aspen Island Theatre Company: $18,793 to assist with costs of the creative development of a new theatre work, ‘Kill Climate Deniers’.

The title of the theatre work - Kill Climate Deniers - could be considered an incitement to commit the crime of murder. Persons of Interest: ACT Government and the  Aspen Island Theatre Company.

Aspen Island is a man-made island on a man-made lake in a man-made capital city. This is all real. However - Man-made Global Warming is a computer generated hoax. That makes this blogger a man-made global warming denier.  But not a climate denier.

What a stupid term!

Who would deny climate?  What is Climate?

From Bob Carter's TAXING AIR:

What is climate?

Climate is the long term average of the weather, and it shapes our lives.
We all live with the weather every day.Thus we understand intuitively what weather is, and that it is above all changeable. Climate is simply the annually recurring patterns of weather, averaged over the longer term. 
Bob also covers the use of the word "denier"
Perjorative name-calling is the stuff of politics, not science. 
It is the mark of a scientific debate that participants confine their discussion to unemotional examination of the factual and theoretical material in hand. How can it be, then, that virtually every public discussion of the global warming problem involves the use of perjorative, ad hominem terms such as climate sceptic, climate denier, contrarian, rejectionist, obscurantist, confusionist or flat-Earther; and in description of those who hold the opposing point of view — climate alarmist, climatist or warmaholic. These terms range from descriptive (alarmist) through amusing (warmaholic) and silly (sceptic) to deliberately offensive (denier) 
Spooner: From Taxing Air

Surely the Alarmists were denying climate (change) when they created the fraudulent hockey stick graph. They tried to suppress the MWP and deny the LIA. They tried to deny climate. They being, inter alia, the ClimateGate CRU and the IPCC "scientists."

Jennifer Marohasy has shown (link) how the Bureau of Meteorology has tried to alter the temperature data; they tried to deny a cooling climate by warming (or homogenising) old data.

Perhaps, if the Aspen Island Theatre company wants to aim their barbs at Climate deniers, they could set their sights on the ClimateGate CRU, the IPCC "scientists" and the Bureau of Meteorology.

H/t Warwick Hughes and Don Aitken

Monday, September 29, 2014

Wind Turbine Noise Intolerable

A study by Kristy Hansen, Branko Zajamsek and Colin Hansen from the School of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Adelaide on:

Waterloo Wind Farm (Source)
arrived at this conclusion:

Therefore, the results show that there is a low frequency noise problem associated with the
Waterloo wind farm. Therefore, it is extremely important that further investigation is carried out at
this wind farm in order to determine the source of the low frequency noise and to develop
mitigation technologies. In addition, further research is necessary to establish the long‐term effects of low frequency noise and infrasound on the residents at Waterloo. This research should include health monitoring and sleep studies with simultaneous noise and vibration measurements.

Shellie Correia, on her blog "Mothers Against Wind Turbines" writes that "noise levels are intolerable: (LINK)
This report by the above authors describes the results of their concurrent full spectrum acoustic monitoring conducted at a number of homes located between 2 km out to nearly 10km from the Waterloo Wind Development. This monitoring was independent of the South Australian Environment Protection Authority (SA EPA) and was requested by Mrs Mary Morris and other concerned residents in the Waterloo district. The monitoring occurred during the period of the South Australian EPA Acoustic Survey, conducted in mid 2013. 
The results in this independent survey as well as the conclusions are in marked contrast to the results and conclusions of the SA EPA Acoustic Survey report, and reinforce the Waubra Foundation’s opinion expressed at the time the initial SA EPA report was released that there were serious problems with the methodology used by the SA EPA in its acoustic survey at Waterloo. This report provides further evidence that the current SA EPA Wind Farm Noise Guidelines do not protect the health and sleep of the neighbours to these wind developments, out to nearly 10km from the closest wind turbine, because they do not regulate the acoustic emissions to protect health, and most importantly, the sleep of the neighbours.
H/t John Droz Jr 

Monday, September 22, 2014

Communists coming out of the Green Closet.

Image source: Oliver Darcy/TheBlaze
Christopher Monckton is presently in Australia. Previously he has said: (link - WUWT)
So at last the communists who piled out of the Berlin Wall and into the environmental movement and took over Greenpeace so that my friends who founded it left within a year because they'd captured it. Now the apotheosis is at hand. They are about to impose a communist world government on the world.
Patrick Moore who will soon visit Australia,  co-founder of Greenpeace, left the Green Movement when it was infiltrated by communists: (link)
The collapse of world communism and the fall of the Berlin Wall during the 1980s added to the trend toward extremism. The Cold War was over and the peace movement was largely disbanded. The peace movement had been mainly Western-based and anti-American in its leanings. Many of its members moved into the environmental movement, bringing with them their neo-Marxist, far-left agendas. 
Progressives are very resilient, so when Soviet communism finally collapsed after 70 years of world wide tyranny, progressives and liberal Democrats pushed the existential green movement to the forefront, which was in reality the same old exhausted red communism in a new disguise. 
The "Green" Movement tried to disguise their "Red" Socialist/Communist ideas, however, now they are coming out of the closet.

The New York "Climate" March, as reported by the Blaze had socialists elements spread through it. (link)
Dozens of signs denouncing capitalism were spotted at the demonstration, often held by self-proclaimed socialists.
“Capitalism is destroying the planet,” a sticker on one woman’s shirt read, “We need revolution, nothing less.”
Image source: Oliver Darcy/TheBlaze

Members of the Socialists Workers Party also manned a table, passing out flyers attempting to make “the case for ecosocialism.” 

Thursday, September 18, 2014

Study Reaffirms Medieval Global Warming

You always hear about the middle ages being a warm time period, but exactly how warm were they? 

Listen to guest speaker Craig Idso while he discusses this topic.
"Scientific Studies have shown that temperatures were significantly warmer about a thousand years ago. Carbon dioxide concentrations in the atmosphere did not cause that warming and evidence suggests temperatures of the current warm period have nothing to do with the modern rise in CO2. There is absolutely nothing unusual, unnatural or unprecedented about Earth's current climate."
Short Youtube:

The True Science Deniers

Sks Trend - RSS 1997 to date
Sceptics are often called "Climate Change Deniers." But we KNOW that climate changes. It always has. By suppressing the Medieval Warm Period and the Little Ice Age, the Alarmists tried to pretend that climate hadn't changed for 1000 or more years.

WHY did they lie?

Surely their lie, their reliance on the flawed "Hockey Stick" graph, was unscientific.

The data sets used by the Alarmists show no warming for at least 18 years. The Alarmists at first denied the hiatus and then found 52 different excuses (link) to try to explain the reason for the lack of warming.

Although they were aware of the hiatus in global warming, the IPCC, in their latest Assessment Report, strangely and some would say unscientifically upgraded their gloom prediction from 90% to 95% (Link)

As Climatologist Judith Curry wrote: (link)
'How did they miss the fact that the pause is the most important issue in the public debate on climate science, for well over a year now?' 
“The IPCC needs to get out of the way so that scientists and policy makers can better do their jobs. We need to put down the IPCC as soon as possible.”

And THEY call US deniers?

Louisiana Governor Bobby Jindal has joined the debate. (link) Addressing POTUS Obama and his "science" team led by John Holdren, he said:
“The reality is right now we’ve got an administration in the Obama administration that are science deniers when it comes to harnessing America’s energy resources and potential to create good-paying jobs for our economy and for our future."
The Alarmists, the Global Warming Nazis, they are the true deniers.

Wednesday, September 17, 2014

Flannery's Fools - Useless Tools.

Flannery's Fools, AKA The Climate Council need counselling. They have issued an Alarmist report:

Climate Change and Coastal Flooding

Flannery examining the flooding ocean.
Perhaps they have been caught napping,

According to the National Geographic, itself a warmist organisation: (link)

The rise in sea levels is linked to three primary factors, all induced by this ongoing global climate change: 
Thermal expansion: When water heats up, it expands. About half of the past century's rise in sea level is attributable to warmer oceans simply occupying more space. 
Melting of glaciers and polar ice caps: Large ice formations, like glaciers and the polar ice caps, naturally melt back a bit each summer. But in the winter, snows, made primarily from evaporated seawater, are generally sufficient to balance out the melting. Recently, though, persistently higher temperatures caused by global warming have led to greater-than-average summer melting as well as diminished snowfall due to later winters and earlier springs. This imbalance results in a significant net gain in runoff versus evaporation for the ocean, causing sea levels to rise. 
Ice loss from Greenland and West Antarctica: As with glaciers and the ice caps, increased heat is causing the massive ice sheets that cover Greenland and Antarctica to melt at an accelerated pace. Scientists also believe meltwater from above and seawater from below is seeping beneath Greenland's and West Antarctica's ice sheets, effectively lubricating ice streams and causing them to move more quickly into the sea. Moreover, higher sea temperatures are causing the massive ice shelves that extend out from Antarctica to melt from below, weaken, and break off.
Let's examine these three causes of sea level rise:

Thermal Expansion

As there has been no global warming for 18 years, this cannot be a factor.

Melting of Glaciers and Polar Ice Caps

A check will find that most glaciers have stopped retreating with many advancing. (Link

Polar Ice is also increasing. Latest data show that Arctic Sea Ice is getting thicker and Antarctic sea ice continues to expand (link) See also "our" ABC - link

Ice Loss Greenland and West Antarctica

As more and more real world evidence disproves the Man Made climate change hoax, Alarmists, like the Climate Council come out with more and more Alarm. This only makes them more and more comical.

Tuesday, September 16, 2014

Climate scare is the real threat to civilization.

Tom Harris and Bob Carter, in a piece for the NY Post have addressed a series of films released by Leo DiCaprio about the so-called "climate crisis."

Forget Leo. He is just spruiking the hot air issued by the Alarmists.

What Tom and Bob have to say answers all the Alarmists.

They say:

  • It is the climate scare itself that is the real threat to civilization.
  • Science is never settled, but the current state of “climate change” science is quite clear: There is essentially zero evidence that carbon dioxide from human activities is causing catastrophic climate change.
  • And the Nongovernmental International Panel on Climate Change lists thousands of scientific papers that either debunk or cast serious doubt on the supposed “consensus” model.
  • Oregon-based physicist Gordon Fulks sums it up well: “CO2 is said to be responsible for global warming that is not occurring, for accelerated sea-level rise that is not occurring, for net glacial and sea ice melt that is not occurring . . . and for increasing extreme weather that is not occurring.”
And lists these facts:

  •  According to NASA satellites and all ground-based temperature measurements, global warming ceased in the late 1990s. This when CO2 levels have risen almost 10 percent since 1997. The post-1997 CO2 emissions represent an astonishing 30 percent of all human-related emissions since the Industrial Revolution began. That we’ve seen no warming contradicts all CO2-based climate models upon which global-warming concerns are founded.
  • Rates of sea-level rise remain small and are even slowing, over recent decades averaging about 1 millimeter per year as measured by tide gauges and 2 to 3 mm/year as inferred from “adjusted” satellite data. Again, this is far less than what the alarmists suggested.
  •  Satellites also show that a greater area of Antarctic sea ice exists now than any time since space-based measurements began in 1979. In other words, the ice caps aren’t melting.
  •  A 2012 IPCC report concluded that there has been no significant increase in either the frequency or intensity of extreme weather events in the modern era. The NIPCC 2013 report concluded the same. Yes, Hurricane Sandy was devastating — but it’s not part of any new trend.
Read more at the NY Post - HERE